Archive for the ‘Buyers’ Category

Fannie Mae Home Path program for buyers

Friday, January 28th, 2011

The HomePath mortgage program is available to buyers that are looking at Fannie Mae owned properties.  It is a special financing program to provide an alternative to FHA and other conventional loans on special Fannie Mae properties.  This loan is available to homes designated as HomePath financing eligible on the www.homepath.com website.

The property can be a single family home, a 2-4 unit property, a townhome or a condominium.  You only need 3% down if you are going to occupy the property.  If it is an investment property, you need to have 10% down.  If you need a non-occupant co-borrower, you  must put a minimum of 5% down.  The mortgage is a 30 yr fixed rate program.

A couple of benefits to the program are that private mortgage insurance is not required and that can save you thousands of dollars over the life of the loan.  You are also not required to have an appraisal done.  The price of the home is the value of the home for the purpose of the transaction.  The seller is allowed to pay up to 6% of the sales price towards closing costs.

Condos do not have to be reviewed for project eligibility.  The down payment can come from a gift.  Grants from a borrower’s employer, a public agency or nonprofit organization can also be used for the down payment.

If the property you are looking at is eligible for HomePath financing, you will need to talk to a lender that is approved for the program.  It could make it much easier to purchase a home that qualifies and save you money every month!

Reposted from HomesMSP.com and Leslie Vanderwerf of Advisors Mortgage.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate the Post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

The Most Overvalued Cities in America

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Can a housing market simultaneously be the most undervalued in the nation and one of the worst housing buys? It can if it’s Las Vegas.

Sin City recently drew a rating of “Frankly Dangerous” — the worst possible — from Local Market Monitor, a North Carolina-based firm that provides investors with analysis on local conditions. The only other city to get that kind of thrashing was Orlando.

Nationally, the great majority of housing markets are now fairly valued, according to Local Market Monitor. Eight markets are overpriced, and 15 are underpriced. That contrasts with the boom years: In mid-2006, 37 of the biggest markets were overpriced, six under and 57 fairly valued.

Las Vegas received a paltry rating even though median home prices there are less $145,000, which is more than half of what they cost at the peak of the bubble and nearly 30% less than what Local Market Monitor calculates would be an “equilibrium price,” or fair market value.

The equilibrium price is based on economic and population growth, construction costs, vacancies, household income and interest rates with an “X Factor” thrown in. That’s a value company founder Ingo Winzer comes up with based on 20 years of market data.

The X Factor is a mathematical constant, unique for each metro area, that represents the premium or discount that buyers have paid for local homes in the past. It captures the tendency for buyers to pay more for homes in what they consider more desirable locations.

A city like San Diego, for example, with its enviable weather and ocean-side location, commands more of a buyer’s premium than does, say, Buffalo, N.Y.

The factors that make Las Vegas’s rating so negative mostly revolve around issues of employment, according to Carolyn Beggs, COO of Local Market Monitor. “Las Vegas has a high concentration of jobs in sectors such as manufacturing and construction, which are considered volatile,” she said.

She contrasts that with the Stockton, Calif., housing market, where home prices are nearly 20% under the equilibrium price, but which the company rates as an average risk. “Stockton has a higher concentration of jobs in healthcare, education and government,” Beggs said.

Both Las Vegas and Orlando have a glut of homes for sale, thanks to years of overbuilding during the housing bubble. They’re also two of the hardest hit foreclosure cities and have suffered outsized price declines, with Vegas values down 52% from their peak and Orlando 39%.

Most crucially, the economies of both cities have a heavy reliance on development, which has taken a huge hit in both places.

The most overvalued area right now is the Long Island, N.Y., counties of Nassau and Suffolk, which are suburbs of New York City. The current average home value there of about $418,000 is 26% higher than the equilibrium value of $318,000.

Even so, Local Market Monitor still gives it a “Typical Risks/Rewards,” rating, an average score. One particular positive factor there is a bright economic picture with unemployment at only 6.9% and some job growth expected this year.

Other overpriced markets include Los Angeles and Portland, Ore., both overvalued by 24%, and Santa Ana, Calif., 23%.

Akron, Ohio, is the second most undervalued market at -22% followed by Cleveland and Warren, Mich., at -21%. To top of page

City Median home price % overvalued for 2011 % overvalued for 2012
Nassau-Suffolk, N.Y. $418,416 26% 27%
Los Angeles $368,056 24% 25%
Portland, Ore. $240,912 24% 23%
Anaheim, Calif. $449,396 23% 25%
Edison, N.J. $286,900 20% 20%
San Jose, Calif. $511,186 19% 22%
New York, N.Y. $403,408 17% 17%
Poughkeepsie, N.Y. $236,016 16% 16%
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate the Post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Housing Recovery — Not seen until 2032 in some cities!!!

Friday, January 7th, 2011

Wow. What? Yes, I have said it before, but it now may be backed up with evidence. A Moody’s analyst, Chen Chen, says that housing recovery to pre-recession levels may not happen until 2032 for Las Vegas, 2034 for Phoenix, 2036 for Salinas, CA and 2038 for South Florida – particularly Naples.  This is definitely cruel and unusual, but it is directly tied to amount of investment and second home traffic they were expecting. Unfortunately, no one in the cold states or developers have any money left to buy these properties. Should we just bull doze them over?  Probably not. If we do that, those cities will look Detroit, Cleaveland and Buffalo.  Yikes.

Take a look at the article here.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate the Post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Are You Thankful for Your Neighbors?

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010

Below is an article from MSN.com about the future of America’s suburbs.  It’s scary but true, many cities in the U.S. over built their outer suburbs and many neighborhoods lay almost vacant. What is your community doing to prevent this type of negative growth? Also if you are thinking of buying, the article has a good check-list of issues to consider…….Read on!

The nation’s suburbs — once the symbol of the American dream — are well on their way to becoming tomorrow’s slums, some experts say.

The one-two punch of a crippling recession and higher gas prices have quelled demand for many of the nation’s fringe communities from Charlotte, N.C., to Sacramento, Calif., while at the same time demographic trends have begun pushing an aging population back to the nation’s urban cores.

That’s prompting some planners to predict a huge surplus of large-lot suburban properties in the years ahead — as many as 25 million homes by 2030, according to Arthur C. Nelson, presidential professor of city and metropolitan planning at the University of Utah and director of its Metropolitan Research Center.

See full article: http://realestate.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=21179977&page=2

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate the Post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

The “Shadow Market” is Increasing…..

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

Banks are giving homeowners extensions on their mortgages or delaying foreclosure proceedings, but these homes may eventually hit the market. According to CoreLogic, the population of homes that are on the verge of foreclosure has grown 10% since last August.  Read the full article: http://www.startribune.com/homes/110021164.html?elr=KArks:DCiUBcy7hUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUoD3aPc:_27EQU

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate the Post
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)